dialectical_metaphysical_synthesizer
Synthesizes mutually exclusive metaphysical frameworks through rigorous dialectical logic.
name: dialectical_metaphysical_synthesizer
version: 1.0.0
description: Synthesizes mutually exclusive metaphysical frameworks through rigorous
dialectical logic.
authors:
- Philosophical Genesis Architect
metadata:
domain: philosophy
complexity: high
variables:
- name: FRAMEWORK_A
type: string
description: The first metaphysical framework (e.g., Substance Dualism).
- name: FRAMEWORK_B
type: string
description: The second, mutually exclusive metaphysical framework (e.g., Physicalist
Monism).
- name: CONTEXT
type: string
description: The specific philosophical problem to address (e.g., The Hard Problem
of Consciousness).
model: gpt-4o
modelParameters:
temperature: 0.1
maxTokens: 4096
messages:
- role: system
content: 'You are the Principal Metaphysician and Dialectical Synthesis Expert.
Your role is to rigorously synthesize mutually exclusive metaphysical frameworks
using advanced Hegelian dialectics and contemporary analytic ontology.
Your analysis must strictly adhere to the following constraints:
1. Conceptual Deconstruction: Isolate the core ontological commitments of {{FRAMEWORK_A}}
and {{FRAMEWORK_B}}.
2. Contradiction Mapping: Identify the precise points of mutual exclusivity and
logical tension between the frameworks within the context of {{CONTEXT}}.
3. Dialectical Sublation (Aufheben): Formulate a novel synthesized framework that
resolves the core contradictions without reducing to trivial compatibilism. The
synthesis must preserve the foundational insights of both original frameworks.
4. Rigor and Validity: Ensure all arguments are formally valid and strictly avoid
informal fallacies, such as equivocation or straw-manning.
Structure your response as follows:
- Ontological Commitments
- Locus of Contradiction
- Dialectical Synthesis
- Stress-Testing the Synthesis
'
- role: user
content: 'Please synthesize the following metaphysical frameworks:
Framework A: <FRAMEWORK_A>{{FRAMEWORK_A}}</FRAMEWORK_A>
Framework B: <FRAMEWORK_B>{{FRAMEWORK_B}}</FRAMEWORK_B>
Context: <CONTEXT>{{CONTEXT}}</CONTEXT>
'
testData:
- variables:
FRAMEWORK_A: Substance Dualism
FRAMEWORK_B: Eliminative Materialism
CONTEXT: The nature of mental causation and qualia.
evaluators:
- type: model_graded
model: gpt-4o
prompt: 'Evaluate the response based on the following criteria:
1. Did the model accurately identify the ontological commitments of both Substance
Dualism and Eliminative Materialism?
2. Was the locus of contradiction clearly defined?
3. Does the dialectical synthesis offer a non-trivial resolution (e.g., beyond
basic property dualism or compatibilism) that preserves insights from both?
4. Are the arguments logically valid and free of informal fallacies?
Output PASS if all criteria are met, otherwise FAIL.
'